NPGM '06: Elections Entry Point Discussion
Abdiqadir Jirde (MP, UDUB)
Just to set the record straight, the House leadership (that is me
and the Speaker) were against the passing of the controversial electoral
bill. So we, too, have to get some credit for promoting the electoral
process.
We have very critical and sensitive issues like the Guurti, which
I think would need wider discussions and I would leave that to when
we break into groups tomorrow. The Academy has given us an opportunity
of "an intellectual space" which is free, to discuss and
debate crucial issues.
Today in Somaliland we have ample opportunities to experiment with
our institutions and to re-arrange them into to our own liking,
because there is no external pressure upon us, dictating to us how
we should envision our institutions or setting the agenda. But we
might not have this opportunity if we get recognised, as we might
not be left alone, and then we might regret loosing this opportunity.
Therefore, we have to utilise this opportunity to examine our current
institutions: What is working and what is not working and then to
seek local solutions to fix or amend what is not working.
Another issue is that we should broaden the public participation
in the decision making process. Public participation should not
be confined to three minutes by casting votes once in five years.
What I mean in wider public participation is constant public debate
on the government and the political parties' policies on key issues.
Both the ruling party and the opposition should encourage public
participation and educate the public about the mechanisms to criticise
policies and decisions made, so that the public can assume its responsibility
as citizens.

Abdikarim Ahmed (Kulmiye)
I just want to comment on the title of the report and the film "A
Vote for Peace". I believe we did not vote for peace but we
voted peacefully and it was the prevailing peace that allowed the
voting process. Therefore I would prefer "Should we be at peace
or not".
Another issue is that the parliamentary election did not complete
the democratisation process, because the election of the Upper House
(Guurti) did not take place. So, saying the election of Parliament
completed the democratisation process is incorrect. So we did not
have Parliamentary elections, we had the House of Representatives'
elections.

Abdirahman Yussuf Artan (MP, Kulmiye)
Recently I went back to Sanaag where I was elected. It was the first
time I went back there since I was elected. The problem in our democracy
is that the elected leaders whether the presidents or the MPs are
disconnected and lack of information on the part of the public.
In the places I went to, people had no information whatsoever on
what is going in Hargeysa. There we need a national radio that reaches
the whole country and informs the public.

Ahmed Haji Adami (Chairman, NEC)
Thank God, we are at peace in Somaliland. However, it looks that
we are putting peace itself in danger when we associate the word
peace with everything, like the Academy is associated with Peace,
and so on. We have not voted for peace but we were voting in peace
or peacefully. So I agree with the previous speaker we have to correct
the title.
Secondly, I want to add that the international consultant was here
to assist us in reviewing an existing law, do not make it sound
as if he started from scratch and nothing was there.
In terms of the democratisation process, we should avoid words like
completing the democratisation process, because the process is still
incomplete. So saying we completed the process might lead to complacency
on the part of the government and everyone else.

Intervention by Mohamed Hassan (APD)
We are not saying we have completed the democratisation process,
because democratisation is a long process that could take hundreds
of years. However, we are saying that the transition from clan-based
politics to a multi-party system has been realised.

Mohammed Musa Awale (Director, NERAD)
I told many women in secret in the National Conference, I don't
know whether Abdiqadir Jirde remembers, to ask the chair to include
quota for women, because I was one of the guys who were doing the
writings for the Chair. Right now it is a must to have a quota for
women. So I am asking: Is it against the constitution to specify
quota for women?
The second thing I would like to know is what the Academy will do
with the information gathered from this seminar or other previous
seminars? Are you going to use this information to take some action,
like drafting laws, or ensuring that the Parliament takes steps
based on this information? The reason I am asking this is that we
are always talking and discussing the same issues - particularly
in the area of environment - in each workshop without dealing with
the problems.

Unknown female speaker
We have been asking the House leadership to include quota for women
candidates, but the House leader was reluctant and not forthcoming
to heed our request. Without quota for women candidates, women have
no chance to be represented in the legislative bodies, because of
the prevailing clanism and the realisation that women would not
vote to women candidates.

Ikraan Haji Dauud (Woman MP, Kulmiye)
To comment on the title "A Vote for Peace": I think without
consolidation of the peace any election in the future would not
be feasible or possible, so I agree with the Academy to call it
"a vote for peace".

Baar Saeed (Woman MP, UDUB)
We have asked for quota before and our request was refused. In reality
women are more than men, and did gain some experience in the previous
election. I would advise women first to get engaged at the party
level and to bargain with the political parties to include women
among the party candidates. I believe many women are ready now and
would vote for many women candidates.

Abdirahman Saeed (UCID)
So far we have covered the electoral process, but you have not covered
the aftermath of the elections, that is what the new MPs have so
far accomplished. You are talking about giving women some quotas,
and we know that our legislative is in an impasse and not producing
any meaningful legislation. You are talking about amending the constitution
and so on, but unfortunately both the government and the legislative
bodies are not functioning and are in a constitutional crisis. So,
we should not expect anything from them.
Another issue: Who are we expecting to implement democracy? Is democracy
only elections? Are we expecting a functioning democracy from the
government, the political parties or the parliament? We said we
embrace democracy, but who is ensuring that we adhere to democratic
principles? We have to define the role of each entity to realise
some kind of functioning democracy.

Muse Ali Faruur (Traditionalist)
In terms of clan identity for women and men in Somali culture: "Wiilku
waa haybta hore, inantuna waa haybta dambe" (Boys' clan identity
is determined initially (at birth) whereas girls' clan identity
is determined later on (at marriage). I.e. girls are identified
with their husband's clan.)

Saeed Ahmed (Interpeace Project Management Team)
The film we saw was talking about the issues that we are discussing,
democracy and elections. If we leave out the word democracy and
just call it "nidaam wadatashi", that is "systemised
consultation", right now the film we saw showed us some of
the existing contradictions in our society in terms of our thinking
and public life. We were laughing at these because we know that
these contradictions are real. This is a testimony when human beings
are allowed to express their views freely or are allowed to participate
in resolving the pressing national issues. This produces such relevant
products. However, if one person does the thinking for all and says
that he or she has absolute power, we know where such dictatorship
has landed us, and what we went through because of it.
Also, I would add that the Academy was the one who was hosting the
meeting, but it was the National Electoral Commission (NEC) who
did the labouring. That is doing the mediation between the three
political parties in the code of conduct discussions. So I just
want to make this very clear.

Ayaan Muse (Havayoco)
I believe women were discriminated throughout the election process.
So, there is a need for massive public awareness to enhance the
acceptance and electibility of women candidates.

Abdiqadir Jirde (MP, UDUB)
Our constitution does allow the freedom of association and individuals
to stand for election independently. But due to our unique situation
there was a need to limit the political parties and it was a choice
between two bad options. It is not a permanent solution, when time
comes there will be some changes. Limiting political parties can
be done in various ways. I do not believe that now is the right
time to assess the performance of the current political parties,
as they are still in nascent stage and waged one cycle of elections.
Let us give it some time, this is my view.
» Elections Presentation
» NPGM Report Index
» Home

|